
The free 15-minute test shows your IQ band and strongest cognitive domain — the numbers this article keeps referring to.
An IQ of 100 sits at the 50th percentile, 115 at the 84th and 130 at the 98th — and the table below gives the exact percentile and rarity for every score from 70 to 160. Percentiles are fixed by the normal distribution the Wechsler scale is built on (mean 100, standard deviation 15), not by which test you happened to take.
Enter a score to see its percentile, rarity and classification on the Wechsler scale (mean 100, SD 15).
An IQ of 100 scores higher than 50% of the population (1 in 2 people), a z-score of 0 on the Wechsler scale (mean 100, SD 15).
| Value | Source | As of | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean IQ, Wechsler scale | 100 | WAIS-IV normative sample | 2008 |
| Standard deviation | 15 | WAIS-IV normative sample | 2008 |
| IQ at the 50th percentile | 100 | Derived, normal CDF | 2026-08 |
| IQ at the 84th percentile | 115 | Derived, normal CDF | 2026-08 |
| IQ at the 98th percentile | 130 | Derived, normal CDF | 2026-08 |
| IQ at the 99.87th percentile | 145 | Derived, normal CDF | 2026-08 |
| Share scoring IQ 85–115 | 68% | Derived, normal CDF | 2026-08 |
| Rarity of IQ 130 | 1 in 44 | Derived, normal CDF | 2026-08 |
| Rarity of IQ 145 | 1 in 741 | Derived, normal CDF | 2026-08 |
| Mensa entry threshold | 98th percentile (IQ 130) | Mensa International | 2026 |
| Income per IQ point above 100 | $234–$616 / year | Zagorsky, Intelligence, 2007 | 2007 |

Florence's experience captures the central paradox of IQ percentiles. The raw score feels intuitive but misleads. The percentile feels abstract but tells the real story. A person scoring 125 is not "25% better" than someone at 100. They are operating in a different cognitive tier entirely, outperforming 95% of the population.
The number 112 felt mediocre. But 79th percentile? That reframed everything.
Most people who receive their IQ results fixate on the wrong number. They compare themselves to the handful of exceptional minds they have encountered rather than understanding their actual competitive position in the broader population.
The tables in this article provide the complete reference, but they are not the point. The point is learning to interpret these numbers as tools for career calibration, not instruments of self-judgment. If you already know your score and want your exact position immediately, try our IQ Percentile Calculator to find your percentile alongside bell curve visualization and rarity statistics.
Here is something that surprises most people: the relationship between IQ scores and percentiles is not linear. Moving from IQ 100 to 110 jumps you from the 50th to the 75th percentile, a 25-percentile leap. But moving from 130 to 140 only bumps you from the 98th to the 99.6th percentile.
This happens because IQ follows a normal distribution. Most people cluster around the center. The extremes are genuinely rare. Each step away from 100 represents a smaller slice of humanity.
We've found that people consistently overestimate how common high scores are. When someone scores 120 and learns they're in the 91st percentile, they often say "that can't be right." It is. The bell curve is steeper than intuition suggests.
Additional annual income per IQ point above 100
Based on longitudinal analysis of income and cognitive ability
Source: Zagorsky, Intelligence, 2007
Here are the anchor points worth memorizing:
These anchor points derive from the standard deviation of 15 points that defines the Wechsler scale, used by most modern IQ assessments including the IQ Career Lab assessment.
Every IQ score from 70 to 160, with its exact percentile, classification and rarity. These figures are generated from the same normal-distribution model that powers our IQ Percentile Calculator, so the table and the calculator cannot disagree.
Two columns need a definition. Percentile is the share of the population scoring at or below that IQ. Rarity is the share in the nearer tail: at 100 and above it reads "1 in N people score this high or higher"; below 100, "1 in N score this low or lower". Every table below carries a permanent anchor, so you can link straight to the band you need.
Scores here sit in the left tail, between the 2nd and 8th percentile. Abstract, self-directed work will feel demanding, but this band is well inside the range where structured roles with clear procedures are sustainable and satisfying. Careers built on reliability, manual skill and interpersonal warmth do not run on abstract reasoning, and the people in them are not compensating for anything.
| Percentile | Classification | Rarity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQ 70 | 2% | Borderline | 1 in 44 |
| IQ 71 | 3% | Borderline | 1 in 38 |
| IQ 72 | 3% | Borderline | 1 in 32 |
| IQ 73 | 4% | Borderline | 1 in 28 |
| IQ 74 | 4% | Borderline | 1 in 24 |
| IQ 75 | 5% | Borderline | 1 in 21 |
| IQ 76 | 5% | Borderline | 1 in 18 |
| IQ 77 | 6% | Borderline | 1 in 16 |
| IQ 78 | 7% | Borderline | 1 in 14 |
| IQ 79 | 8% | Borderline | 1 in 12 |
Roughly one American in seven scores in this band. Skilled trades, logistics, hospitality and customer-facing roles sit comfortably here, and several of them out-earn jobs two bands higher. Cognitive tier predicts which work feels effortful; it does not predict pay, and the two are confused constantly.
| Percentile | Classification | Rarity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQ 80 | 9% | Low Average | 1 in 11 |
| IQ 81 | 10% | Low Average | 1 in 10 |
| IQ 82 | 12% | Low Average | 1 in 9 |
| IQ 83 | 13% | Low Average | 1 in 8 |
| IQ 84 | 14% | Low Average | 1 in 7 |
| IQ 85 | 16% | Low Average | 1 in 6 |
| IQ 86 | 18% | Low Average | 1 in 6 |
| IQ 87 | 19% | Low Average | 1 in 5 |
| IQ 88 | 21% | Low Average | 1 in 5 |
| IQ 89 | 23% | Low Average | 1 in 4 |
Half the population sits inside this twenty-point band, which is why it is the widest table on the page. Administrative work, nursing, teaching, sales and most of the skilled trades cluster here. Job satisfaction in this range often beats that of higher scorers, for an unglamorous reason: cognitive demand matches cognitive supply, so there is no chronic boredom and no sense that the brain is idling.
| Percentile | Classification | Rarity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQ 90 | 25% | Average | 1 in 4 |
| IQ 91 | 27% | Average | 1 in 4 |
| IQ 92 | 30% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 93 | 32% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 94 | 34% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 95 | 37% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 96 | 39% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 97 | 42% | Average | 1 in 2 |
| IQ 98 | 45% | Average | 1 in 2 |
| IQ 99 | 47% | Average | 1 in 2 |
| IQ 100 | 50% | Average | 1 in 2 |
| IQ 101 | 53% | Average | 1 in 2 |
| IQ 102 | 55% | Average | 1 in 2 |
| IQ 103 | 58% | Average | 1 in 2 |
| IQ 104 | 61% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 105 | 63% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 106 | 66% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 107 | 68% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 108 | 70% | Average | 1 in 3 |
| IQ 109 | 73% | Average | 1 in 4 |

This is where most white-collar professionals operate. Teachers, nurses, accountants and mid-level managers cluster in this band.
At 115 you reach the first real milestone: the 84th percentile, one full standard deviation above the mean. Occupational psychology consistently finds this threshold correlates with success in roles requiring independent judgment and complex information processing, and many graduate programmes implicitly assume ability at or above it.
| Percentile | Classification | Rarity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQ 110 | 75% | High Average | 1 in 4 |
| IQ 111 | 77% | High Average | 1 in 4 |
| IQ 112 | 79% | High Average | 1 in 5 |
| IQ 113 | 81% | High Average | 1 in 5 |
| IQ 114 | 82% | High Average | 1 in 6 |
| IQ 115 | 84% | High Average | 1 in 6 |
| IQ 116 | 86% | High Average | 1 in 7 |
| IQ 117 | 87% | High Average | 1 in 8 |
| IQ 118 | 88% | High Average | 1 in 9 |
| IQ 119 | 90% | High Average | 1 in 10 |
This is professional territory. Physicians, attorneys, engineers and senior analysts cluster here, with the raw cognitive horsepower for graduate-level work and complex problem-solving.
What the percentile does not capture is fit. A 125 attorney who hates conflict will be miserable in litigation; a 122 engineer who craves human contact will burn out writing code alone. The percentile gets you in the door. Personality and interest alignment determine whether you stay.
| Percentile | Classification | Rarity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQ 120 | 91% | Superior | 1 in 11 |
| IQ 121 | 92% | Superior | 1 in 12 |
| IQ 122 | 93% | Superior | 1 in 14 |
| IQ 123 | 94% | Superior | 1 in 16 |
| IQ 124 | 95% | Superior | 1 in 18 |
| IQ 125 | 95% | Superior | 1 in 21 |
| IQ 126 | 96% | Superior | 1 in 24 |
| IQ 127 | 96% | Superior | 1 in 28 |
| IQ 128 | 97% | Superior | 1 in 32 |
| IQ 129 | 97% | Superior | 1 in 38 |
“At 130 you join the top 2%. At 145 you are 1 in 741. But the loneliest part of the bell curve is not intelligence itself. It is finding peers who think at your pace.”
Above 130 the population thins fast. This is where Mensa membership begins, where academic research becomes cognitively natural, and where strategic consulting firms actively recruit. Note how much slower the percentile column moves than the rarity column across this band: percentile is nearly exhausted by 140, while rarity keeps multiplying.
| Percentile | Classification | Rarity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQ 130 | 98% | Very Superior | 1 in 44 |
| IQ 131 | 98% | Very Superior | 1 in 52 |
| IQ 132 | 98% | Very Superior | 1 in 61 |
| IQ 133 | 99% | Very Superior | 1 in 72 |
| IQ 134 | 99% | Very Superior | 1 in 85 |
| IQ 135 | 99.0% | Very Superior | 1 in 102 |
| IQ 136 | 99.2% | Very Superior | 1 in 122 |
| IQ 137 | 99.3% | Very Superior | 1 in 147 |
| IQ 138 | 99.4% | Very Superior | 1 in 177 |
| IQ 139 | 99.53% | Very Superior | 1 in 215 |
| IQ 140 | 99.62% | Very Superior | 1 in 261 |
| IQ 141 | 99.69% | Very Superior | 1 in 319 |
| IQ 142 | 99.74% | Very Superior | 1 in 391 |
| IQ 143 | 99.79% | Very Superior | 1 in 482 |
| IQ 144 | 99.83% | Very Superior | 1 in 596 |
At this point the percentile column stops being useful, which is exactly why the rarity column exists. Every score from 145 up rounds to "99.9-something", but the number of people involved falls by a factor of more than forty between 145 and 160. If you want to compare scores in this range, compare rarities, not percentiles.
| Percentile | Classification | Rarity | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IQ 145 | 99.87% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 741 |
| IQ 146 | 99.89% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 924 |
| IQ 147 | 99.91% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 1,157 |
| IQ 148 | 99.93% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 1,455 |
| IQ 149 | 99.95% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 1,838 |
| IQ 150 | 99.96% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 2,330 |
| IQ 151 | 99.97% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 2,968 |
| IQ 152 | 99.97% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 3,795 |
| IQ 153 | 99.98% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 4,873 |
| IQ 154 | 99.98% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 6,284 |
| IQ 155 | 99.99% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 8,137 |
| IQ 156 | 99.99% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 10,581 |
| IQ 157 | 99.99% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 13,817 |
| IQ 158 | 99.99% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 18,120 |
| IQ 159 | 99.99% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 23,863 |
| IQ 160 | 99.99% | Genius / Near-Genius | 1 in 31,560 |
Numbers on a page accomplish nothing. What matters is translating percentile position into career calibration.
Different career tiers demand different cognitive profiles. Mismatches in either direction create problems.

Underemployment occurs when your cognitive bandwidth exceeds job demands. If you score in the 90th percentile but work a role designed for the 50th, chronic boredom sets in. The brain craves appropriate challenge. This is why high-IQ individuals often burn out in middle management despite ostensible career success.
At 130, you join the top 2%. At 145, you're 1 in 741. But the loneliest part isn't intelligence. It's finding peers who think at your pace.
Overload occurs when job demands exceed cognitive bandwidth. Chronic stress, imposter syndrome, and eventual failure become likely. Neither extreme leads to sustainable career satisfaction.
The sweet spot is matching role complexity to cognitive capacity.
| Career Tier | Example Roles | Median Salary | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16th-50th (IQ 85-100) | Entry/Skilled | Admin, Trades, Retail | $35K-$55K |
| 50th-84th (IQ 100-115) | Professional | Nurses, Teachers, IT | $50K-$85K |
| 84th-97th (IQ 115-130) | Advanced Professional | Engineers, Attorneys | $80K-$180K |
| 98th+ (IQ 130+) | Elite | Quants, Executives, PhDs | $100K-$400K+ |
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics occupational data, 2024
This is the sweet spot for professional careers. You have the cognitive bandwidth for investment banking, law, medicine, or data science. The question is not whether you are smart enough. The question is which domain leverages your specific cognitive strengths.

At this level, many corporate structures feel constraining. The cognitive distance from average peers creates communication friction. Repetitive tasks feel intolerable. This is why gifted individuals often gravitate toward entrepreneurship, research, or consulting where novelty and autonomy are built into the work.
If you score here and feel chronically bored, the problem may not be attitude. It may be cognitive mismatch. Consider whether a strategic career pivot could better leverage your processing power.
The twice-exceptional population, those with high IQ plus conditions like ADHD or autism, requires particularly careful career matching. Raw cognitive horsepower means little if executive dysfunction or sensory overwhelm derails performance.
For the statistically inclined, percentile rank derives from the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the normal distribution:
Percentile = CDF((IQ Score - 100) / 15) x 100
This converts your IQ score to a z-score (standard deviations from mean), then maps that z-score to the percentage of the population scoring at or below your level. Our IQ Standard Deviation Calculator performs this calculation instantly and shows your position on an interactive bell curve.
What percentage of the population scores between IQ 85 and 115?
| IQ Score | Percentile | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| -3 SD | 55 | 0.1st | Extremely Rare (Low) |
| -2 SD | 70 | 2nd | Borderline |
| -1 SD | 85 | 16th | Low Average |
| Mean | 100 | 50th | Average |
| +1 SD | 115 | 84th | High Average |
| +2 SD | 130 | 98th | Gifted |
| +3 SD | 145 | 99.87th | Genius |
Different testing organizations use slightly different terminology. The underlying percentiles remain identical, a score is a score regardless of label.
| Wechsler Term | Stanford-Binet Term | Percentile | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 145+ | Very Superior | Highly Advanced | 99.87th+ |
| 130-144 | Very Superior | Gifted | 98th-99.8th |
| 120-129 | Superior | Superior | 91st-97th |
| 110-119 | High Average | High Average | 75th-90th |
| 90-109 | Average | Average | 25th-74th |
| 80-89 | Low Average | Low Average | 9th-24th |
| 70-79 | Borderline | Borderline | 2nd-8th |
| Below 70 | Extremely Low | Impaired | Below 2nd |
Note on Stanford-Binet: The Stanford-Binet Fifth Edition (SB5), released in 2003, adopted a standard deviation of 15 to align with Wechsler scales. Earlier versions used SD=16, which you may encounter in older literature. The IQ Career Lab assessment uses the Wechsler-equivalent SD=15 standard.
With a 2024 US population of approximately 335 million, here is what the percentile distribution actually looks like:
That "rare" IQ 130 score? More than seven and a half million people share it. The giftedness is real, but you are not alone.
Here's a counterintuitive finding: those 7.6 million people are not evenly distributed. They cluster in certain zip codes, industries, and institutions. If you grew up in a high-education environment, a 130 IQ might feel ordinary because everyone around you was similar. If you grew up elsewhere, that same score might have made you the smartest person in every room you entered. Same percentile, radically different lived experience.
These tables tell you where you stand. They say nothing about what to do next.
The person who scores 110 and builds deep expertise in a high-demand niche will out-earn the person who scores 140 and drifts without direction. I've seen it happen repeatedly. Cognitive ability is an asset, but assets require investment strategies.

If you scored higher than expected, resist complacency. Raw cognitive power means nothing without execution. If you scored lower than expected, resist despair. Emotional intelligence, grit, and strategic positioning routinely outweigh IQ differentials in career outcomes.
Knowing your percentile isn't about validation. It's calibration. You can't optimize what you don't measure. Now you have the data.
Stop guessing. Our cognitive assessment provides your IQ score with exact percentile ranking, cognitive sub-skill breakdown, and AI-powered career matches tailored to your cognitive profile.
Photos by Lukas, Mikhail Nilov, fauxels, Tima Miroshnichenko, and Vlada Karpovich
Fifteen minutes, free to take, no sign-up to start. Your band and strongest domain stay free.
The article explains the idea; these measure it.